<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power Options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cix.ie/2008/08/16/power-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cix.ie/2008/08/16/power-options/</link>
	<description>Cork's hyper energy efficient Professional Data Centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Beecher</title>
		<link>http://www.cix.ie/2008/08/16/power-options/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Beecher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cix.ie/?p=79#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Alan, we&#039;ve notified the vendor and asked them to look into it.

The UPS&#039; are &quot;PurePulse&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Alan, we&#8217;ve notified the vendor and asked them to look into it.</p>
<p>The UPS&#8217; are &#8220;PurePulse&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan GORDON</title>
		<link>http://www.cix.ie/2008/08/16/power-options/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan GORDON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cix.ie/?p=79#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>In the picture given as an example of a customer using a static switch to power the -48V supply from both A and B power, the battery blocks at the base of the cabinet/rack have visibly un-shrouded terminals, above which is placed a painted metal cover.

In the interest of safety, would it not be advisable to shroud the terminals or, better still house the UPS in a non-conducting protective enclosure?

Also, which version of GE&#039;s &#039;SG&#039; UPS are you using, Series 1 or the PurePower?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the picture given as an example of a customer using a static switch to power the -48V supply from both A and B power, the battery blocks at the base of the cabinet/rack have visibly un-shrouded terminals, above which is placed a painted metal cover.</p>
<p>In the interest of safety, would it not be advisable to shroud the terminals or, better still house the UPS in a non-conducting protective enclosure?</p>
<p>Also, which version of GE&#8217;s &#8216;SG&#8217; UPS are you using, Series 1 or the PurePower?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

